VALUE EDUCATION FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY*

         Value Education is once again selected as a theme of study at an educational arena such as this august assembly. It is a favorite preoccupation of many an educator who believes in the character formation of youth through practice and the improvement of life and mind through the cultivation of proper virtues.
            There is a close connection between the aims of education and value education. Suppose a student ware to inquire whether he should aim at excellence in his studies or in athletics. One ready response might be that it depends on some intermediate aim such as a career aim. If the student is a good enough athlete to consider a career in professional sport, he might very well concentrate on sports and relegate his studies to second place and vice versa. The choice is contingent on aims or values lying outside or beyond the two between which the student is trying to establish a priority.
            If all values are relative to individual taste, what is to become of social stability? What will happen to moral education if there is no settled curriculum of what is right and what is wrong? In other words, what is learned in schools may not be worthwhile if the curriculum contents do not include value education.
           Before we proceed any further, it may be well to ask a question :
What is a "VALUE"? **
        Today the word "value" is, in every sense, a current term, though first used in a technical sense in political economy, it was gradually incorporated into our contemporary philosophical language, where in many cases it stands for what our ancestors called "the Good".
        Towards the end of the 19th century (see Nietzsche’s Magnum Opus, "The Will to Power, a Revaluation of Values"), German, English, American and French philosophers developed a variety of sometimes conflicting value theories or "axiologies". So, the term "value" is used in our contemporary culture with widespread confusion and obfuscation.
Three Definitions of "Value"
a) Subjectively, a value is the character attributed to things in so far as they are esteemed or desired by a subject or, more usually, by a given group (e.g. water has a utility value; a diamond has an exchange value, etc.) Value, thus, means the worth of something and when we know the estimate of its worth we say we have its "valuation."
        b) Objectively, and categorically, it is the character attributed to things in so far as they deserve to be esteemed. The value
of things is not a fact.
        c) Objectively, but hypothetically, a value is the character attributed to thins in so far as they fulfill a certain end (e.g. the
documentary value of a work of art).
Value: a Mobile Concept
        The significance or meaning of "Value" is difficult to define rigorously because the word usually conveys a mobile concept, a transition from fact to principle, from the desired to the desirable, generally through the intermediary of what is commonly desired.
          To this first level of judgment one can add a new judgment, equally of a critical nature, which either approves or disapproves of the commonly held opinion. This second judgment can be normative, in varying degrees, and can vary in relation to the domains envisaged.
Value and Norm
        The norm, in both the concrete and the abstract sense, is the equivalent of an ideal, a rule, an aim or a model. Though rarely used in former days, the term has now become current. The three basic types of norms are respectively related to the idea of the true, the good, and the beautiful.
        The ideas of the true, the good and the beautiful are philosophical foundations underlying the curriculum. While we might grant at once that a curriculum composed of the true, the good, and the beautiful is well proportioned, we are aware of the difficulties which divide men on the nature of the true, the good, and the beautiful. At the same time, we also are aware of the fact that the curriculum can be viewed either from the angle of knowledge or from the angle of value.
Here we shall confine our investigation to the role of values in the curriculum only. Furthermore, in the context of the XI th PAPE Congress, the priority of values under study will be "Education for Social Responsibility"
Education for Social Responsibility at the national level.
        In 1982, the National Education Commission outlined some basic concepts and directions for the development of youth and education in social responsibility they are :
  1. Young people have the dignity, rights and privileges as human beings. This basic belief implies that youth cannot be shaped according to anyone's wishes without consideration of their own potential, their own will and power, their conception of their own role in transforming themselves and society and their ability to make their own decisions.
  2. Human development takes place ass through life. During certain periods of life, however, there are critical moments and focal points where there occur what appears to be sudden physiological changes, and perceptual abilities, particularly those which deal with adjustment and role changes resulting from experience and environmental influences. Youth is critically prone to these critical developmental processes.
  3. There are inter-relationships among such factors as poverty, malnutrition, illness, lack of education opportunity, ignorance lack of vocational skills, unemployment, population increase, unavailability of basic services or sub-standard services. These interrelated factors represent obstacles to development and entail economic difficulties which affect youth itself. Ultimately this results in some youth groups having problems which affect the whole society. Therefore, to try to develop only the youth without due regard for these problems, will not produce the desired results.
  4. Youth is the target of development, but at the same time it can contribute to development. Therefore, all young people ought to be given the opportunity to develop themselves to the best of their abilities; those who are privileged must help those who are deprived. Moreover, development can not be focused on youth alone but it must take into consideration the total economic and social development of the society.
  5. The development of youth is based on social justice and equality of opportunity in society and on the need for all to develop themselves according to their potential. Therefore, youth development activities should not be politicized.
  6. Our society must be one of free individuals who are bound together by principles of equality and justice, respect each other's rights and freedom, do not take advantage of others for selfish reasons and who live peacefully together on a basis of moral principles.
  7. Our society must have honest and just administrators and a government which seeks the common good, maintains and promotes this common good to the best of the ability of its members, within available resources, so that there be integrity and security in life, that those in need be given necessary assistance, and that basic services be extended to all.
  8. Young people must be given the opportunity to develop their personality, to become creative, be able to participate in the process of building value whether it be cultural or moral and to assume

   *The XI the PAPE Congress, November 28-30, 1989 (A country paper: Thailand).
   *According to A. Lalande, Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie Presses universitaires 
     de France, 1976)
   *ครู อาจารย์ นักบริหารการศึกษา และนักบริหารการพัฒนา : ภราดา ดร. ประทีป ม.โกมลมาศ